Page 49 - 2016年光通信竞争力报告(摘要版)
P. 49
30 The competitiveness report on "the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the optical communications industry of China & Global market in 2016” (Abstract Edition)
Table3-3-1 The standard value weighted of financial data of the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the optical fiber and cable field of China during 2015-2016
Scale sub-factors˄weight 44%˅ The standard value weighted of financial data Increase sub-factors˄weight 29%˅
Efficiency sub-factors˄weight 27%˅
Total Sales The ratio of The The
revenues international average average
Ranking of Ranking of standard Total Ranking of Return Return contribution Total Ranking of growth rate growth rate Total Ranking of
on net revenue standard standard of sales standard standard
Company comprehensive financial data value Sales Net Net standard standard on total assets per to total sales revenues of net
revenues assets profit employee value value for the last profit value value
competitiveness competitiveness weighted of value value assets weight revenues weighted weighted three years for the last weighted weighted
weight 8% weight of efficiency three years of increase of increase
index index the 13% weighted weighted 5% weight of weight
6% index efficiency 14% weight index index
financial of scale of scale 15%
index
weight weight index index weight
18% 13% 8%
YOFC 1 1 2.3869 1.4603 0.2316 0.5166 2.2084 1 0.0209 0.0595 0.0313 0.0128 0.1245 2 0.0241 0.0299 0.0540 8
HTGD 2 2 2.1149 1.0551 0.2987 0.5186 1.8724 2 0.0044 0.0629 0.0254 0.0083 0.1010 4 0.0817 0.0598 0.1414 3
FiberHome Communications 3 3 1.8339 0.7162 0.3389 0.5999 1.6550 3 -0.0023 0.0305 0.0146 0.0601 0.1029 3 0.0660 0.0100 0.0761 7
Futong 4 4 1.7040 0.9331 0.2373 0.3524 1.5228 4 0.0097 0.0286 0.0392 -0.0114 0.0660 5 0.1071 0.0081 0.1152 6
ZTT 5 5 1.6878 0.7318 0.2336 0.3791 1.3445 5 0.0173 0.0335 0.0413 0.0447 0.1368 1 0.1400 0.0665 0.2065 1
Tongding 6 6 0.6133 0.3369 0.1608 0.1442 0.6418 6 0.0023 0.0202 0.0054 0.0001 0.0279 7 -0.0361 -0.0204 -0.0564 10
SDGI 7 7 0.5774 0.3120 0.0663 0.0561 0.4344 7 -0.0069 0.0157 -0.0024 0.0062 0.0125 8 0.0487 0.0819 0.1305 4
Yongding 8 8 0.5769 0.0939 0.0966 0.1415 0.3320 8 0.0105 0.0240 0.0304 -0.0076 0.0573 6 0.0376 0.1500 0.1876 2
Tongguang 9 9 0.2717 0.0757 0.0136 0.0609 0.1502 9 -0.0017 0.0061 0.0061 -0.0078 0.0027 11 -0.0106 0.1294 0.1188 5
Potevio Fasten 10 10 -0.1664 0.0256 0.0278 -0.0270 0.0264 12 -0.0211 -0.0180 -0.0041 0.0531 0.0099 9 -0.1084 -0.0944 -0.2028 12
1. The standard value of financial data in comparison of 9 individual indicators among the Top 10
competitiveness enterprises in the optical fiber and cable field of China
Chart 3-3-1 The standard value of sales revenues in comparison of the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the
optical fiber and cable field
…For more details please refer to " The competitiveness report on 'the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in
the optical communications industry of China & Global market during 2015-2016' (Integrated Edition)"
2. The analysis of the enterprise competitiveness status of the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the
optical fiber and cable field of China
Chart 3-3-10 The competitiveness chart of YOFC
…For more details please refer to " The competitiveness report on 'the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in
the optical communications industry of China & Global market during 2015-2016' (Integrated Edition)"
3. The analysis of strength and weakness of the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the optical fiber and
cable field of China
The financial data of competitiveness is formed by 9 indicators of certain weight, and the strength and weakness indicators are
different in each company. We classify the 9 indicators into 2 sorts: one is higher than the competitiveness score of the company, that
is, these indicators improve the company's competitiveness, we call it the strength indicator; otherwise, it is weakness indicators. What
the readers should be reminded is that we classify the sorts by the standard value of financial data in companies' competitiveness,
but not the average score of the whole industry. For example, Zhongtian's standard value of the sales revenues is 4.0654, above the
average value, and above the standard value of the company's competitiveness, thus we put it into strength indicators. In the tables,
the strength indicator is labeled by "↑", and weakness indicator by "↓". With the indicators divided into 2 sorts, the enterprises can pay
more attention to their weakness ones, which oriented their effort to improve the competitiveness. As for the order of the indicators to
draw attention, you can refer to the indicators of the corporators' specific data to determine.
Table 3-3-2 The analysis of the strength and weakness index among the enterprises in the optical fiber and cable field of China
Company Ranking Sales Net assets Net profit Return on Return on Sales revenues The ratio of The average growth rate The average growth rate
YOFC 1 revenues ĭ total assets net assets contribution per international revenue of sales revenues for the of net profit for the
to total sales revenues last three years
ĭ į į į employee last three years
į į
į į
HTGD 2 ĭ ĭ ĭ į į į į į į
FiberHome Communications 3 ĭ ĭ ĭ į į į į į į
Futong 4 ĭ ĭ ĭ į į į į į į
ZTT 5 ĭ ĭ ĭ į į į į į į
Tongding 6 ĭ ĭ ĭ į į į į į į
SDGI 7 ĭ į į į ĭ į į į į
Yongding 8 į ĭ ĭ į į ĭ į į ĭ
Tongguang 9 ĭ į ĭ į į į į į ĭ
Potevio Fasten 10 ĭ ĭ į į į ĭ ĭ į į
Section4 ：Competitiveness analysis of "the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the
optical transmission and network access equipment field of China"
Table3-4-1 The standard value weighted of financial data of the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the optical
transmission and network access equipment field of China during 2015-2016
