Page 13 - Market Analysis Report of Optical Communications Field in China & Global market 2020

II-VI
O-net
Accelink
Fujikura
Lumentum
Company
Broadcom
Furukawa Electric
Hisense Broadband
Sumitomo Electric
Zhongji Innolight
8
2
3
6
7
5
4
9
1
10
Ranking
18%
Sales
weight
0.9413
1.9023
0.4092
1.1938
1.5005
1.2460
2.6018
0.2843
1.0446
1.1186
revenues
Net
13%
assets
weight
0.0640
0.0219
0.0721
0.1783
0.0073
0.0852
0.0397
0.0566
0.1192
0.1011
Net
13%
profits
weight
0.0361
0.0933
0.0626
0.0879
0.2429
0.0423
0.0769
0.0085
0.0577
-0.3572
8%
weight
Return
assets
on total
0.0425
0.0182
0.0022
0.0017
0.0689
0.0100
0.0214
0.0144
0.0108
8%
assets
on net
weight
Return
0.0171
0.0051
0.0177
0.0353
0.0256
0.0184
0.0686
0.0758
0.0206
-0.1320 -0.1218
per
5%
Sales
weight
employee
0.0802
0.0239
revenues
-0.0007
-0.0213
-0.0218
-0.0207
-0.0061
-0.0201
-0.0077
-0.0064
contribution
6%
weight
0.0162
0.0056
0.0150
revenue
0.0139
revenues
0.0279
0.0187
0.0297
-0.0040
-0.0095
-0.0062
The ratio of
international
to total sales
14%
the released annual reports of the enterprises listed in the rankings, and make no more in subdivision.
weight
0.0491
0.0522
0.0803
0.0755
-0.1172
-0.0563
-0.1545
-0.1400
-0.1205
-0.1400
for the last
three years
The average
sales revenues
growth rate of
calculated according to the contribution rate of the enterprise’s total profit rate, net assets and total assets.
The weighted standard value indexs of financial datač70% weightĎ
15%
weight
0.1500
0.0513
0.0009
0.0599
0.0027
-0.0180
-0.0455
-0.0061
-0.1500
-0.1500
for the last
three years
growth rate
of net profits
The average
of
(A)
Total
1.5404
2.0939
1.1171
0.9842
1.2846
standard
0.9991
0.4991
0.3524
weighted
2.6799
1.5390
value indexs
financial data
34%
weight
0.4301
0.7191
0.4359
0.5713
0.5672
0.5846
0.5893
0.7325
0.7288
0.7119
innovation
Technology
18%
weight
0.4189
0.3788
0.4434
0.2909
0.4551
0.3073
0.3624
0.4974
Customer
0.3746
0.3515
satisfaction
[-1,1]. With the consistency of statistical test, the overdone impact on overall standard value of financial data by the abnormal data of growth index can be eliminated.
the relevant products in the optical communications division of the enterprise; Net assets data is collected from the optical communications division of the enterprise.
12%
Brand
weight
0.3696
0.3511
0.3790
0.3884
0.3721
0.4353
0.3639
0.4467
0.2931
0.2930
awareness
11%
of net profits. The formula of calculating “return on net assets” is: Return on net assets=net profit before tax/ net assets; Return on total assets=Net profits before tax/ total assets.
weight
level of
0.2944
0.2676
0.2924
0.3394
0.3362
0.2081
0.1749
0.2146
0.2849
0.1773
enterprise
Management
25%
weight
culture
0.4017
0.6582
0.5793
0.5234
0.6354
0.6473
0.5829
0.6245
0.6193
0.6055
Corporation
(B)
Total
The weighted standard value indexs of survey data(30% weight)
standard
2.0887
weighted
2.4392
2.1884
2.4022
1.8408
2.0757
2.0872
2.4884
2.2897
2.2105
value indexs
of survey data
0.7989
1.4081
1.3155
1.5861
1.7405
0.9721
1.8248
2.6077
2.1864
indexs of
1.3559
(A*70%+B*30%)
Comprehensive
competitiveness
Communications Field of Global & China Market (2020)
954
930
957
979
966
968
941
962
953
1000
scores of
competitiveness
Comprehensive
The 14 th Ranking Event of Top 10 Competitiveness Enterprises in the Optical
Source of financial data
Annual report of listed company
Annual report of listed company
Annual report of listed company
Annual report of listed company
Annual report of listed company
Annual report of listed company
Annual report of listed company
Annual report of listed company
Annual report of listed company
Annual report of listed company
The ranking of "the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the optical components and auxiliary equipment field of Global market in 2020"
64"
64"
64"
+BQBO
+BQBO
+BQBO
$IJOB
$IJOB
$IJOB
$IJOB
the enterprise competitiveness is usually unstable. The main reason for the enterprise competitiveness instability is that the original sales revenues base in these enterprises was small and the increasing sales revenues of recent 2 years make the average growth rate of the past
Country
3 years far higher than the industry average level. The extremely high standard value of a certain indicator in the company may cause the standard value of financial data competitiveness index over high on the whole. But in the second or third years, when the growth rate of sales
competitiveness evaluation, we find a practical way to improve it. That is, we set the upper and low limit of standard value in the increase indicators (the average growth rate of revenues for the last three years & the average growth rate of net profit for the last three years) within
revenues drops to the normal average level and instead there is no higher growth in the other indicators, the monitoring index of the enterprise competitiveness will decline significantly. To avoid the impact of abnormal change in financial indicators on the objectivity of the enterprise
Note 2: The calculation data of return on net assets and return on total assets are collected from the net profit, net assets and total assets of the communication division of the selected enterprises. If the enterprise listed does not reveal relevant data in its annual report, they will be
Note 1: For the financial data of sales revenues indicator, due to enterprises’ sales revenues derived from diversified products, the data we collect is based on the revenues of relevant products in each sub-sectors of optical communications division. Net profit data is collected from
Note 3: As for the four indicators of sales revenues contribution per employee, the ratio of international revenue to total sales revenues, the average growth rate of sales revenues for the last three years and the average growth rate of net profit for the last three years, we refer to
Note 5: From the monitoring data, it is found that if the enterprise competitiveness comes mainly from the increase indicators (that is, the average growth rate of revenues for the last three years & the average growth rate of net profit for the last three years), the monitoring data of
Note 4: “Return on net assets” can be defined in different formula. To avoid the incomparable problem of net profit caused by the different corporate income tax rate in listed companies and unlisted companies, we define the molecular in the formula as net profit before tax instead
13