Page 31 - Market Analysis Report of Optical Communications Field in China & Global market 2019
P. 31

Chapter 6   Competitiveness Analysis of "the Top 10 comprehensive competitiveness
          enterprises in the optical communications field of China in 2019"

          Ⅰ Analysis of Financial Data

                  Table6-1 The standard value weighted of financial data of the top 10 competitiveness enterprises
                                        in the optical communications field of China in 2019
                                                                   The standard value weighted of financial data
                                              Scale sub-factors˄weight 44%˅  Efficiency sub-factors˄weight 27%˅  Increase sub-factors˄weight 29%˅
                                    Total                                                       The   The
                    Ranking of  Ranking of  standard                     Sales  The ratio of  Ranking of  average  average
                   comprehensive  financial data  value  Sales  Net  Net  Total  Ranking of  Return  Return  revenues  international  Total  standard  growth rate  growth rate  Total  Ranking of
            Company                                   standard  standard  on total  on net  contribution   revenue  standard  of sales  of net  standard  standard
                   competitiveness  competitiveness weighted of  revenues  assets  profit  assets  assets  per  to total sales  value   revenues  profit
                      index  index   the               value  value      employee  revenues  value  weighted  for the last  for the last  value  value
                                  financial data      weighted weighted             weighted  of          weighted  weighted
                                                      of scale  of scale           of efficiency  efficiency   three years  three years of increase of increase
                                         weight  weight  weight  index  index  weight  weight  weight  weight  index  index  weight  weight  index  index
                                          18%  13%  13%          8%  8%   5%   6%               14%   15%
             Huawei   1       1     3.6272  1.3259  1.1483 0.5170  2.9911   1  0.0350 0.1330  0.1047   0.1703    0.4429   1  0.0432   0.1500    0.1932   4
             HTGD     3       3     1.1372  0.5851  0.1289 0.0125  0.7265   4  0.0206 0.0975  0.0385   0.0236    0.1802   4  0.0805   0.1500    0.2305   2
              ZTE     4       4     0.7543  0.5463  0.5199 -0.2076  0.8587   3  -0.0242 -0.0348  0.0151   0.1211    0.0772   9  -0.0316   -0.1500   -0.1816   11

             Futong   5       5     0.7409  0.4299  -0.0107 -0.0108  0.4084   6  0.0187 0.0408  0.0419   0.0229    0.1243   5  0.0582   0.1500    0.2082   3
              ZTT     6       6     0.6982  0.3672  0.2227 -0.0120  0.5779   5  0.0174 0.0396  0.0676   0.1032    0.2278   3  0.0112   -0.1188   -0.1076   8
              SDGI    7       7     0.5344  0.2396  -0.0093 -0.0188  0.2114   7  0.0010 0.0513  0.0188   0.0177    0.0888   6  0.0842   0.1500    0.2342   1

             Zhongli  8       8     0.2623  0.0052  0.0769 -0.0188  0.0633   8  -0.0179 -0.0080  0.0406   0.0709    0.0857   7  0.0281   0.0852    0.1133   6
             Yongding  9      10    -0.2111  -0.0613 -0.0031 -0.0210  -0.0853   10  0.0007 0.0207  -0.0015  -0.0114   0.0085   10  0.0157   -0.1500   -0.1342   9
            Fuchunjiang  10   11    -0.2112  -0.0656 -0.0300 -0.0244  -0.1199   11  0.0068 0.0204  0.0355   0.0168    0.0795   8  -0.0208   -0.1500   -0.1708   10

          Ⅱ Financial Data of Return on Net Assets in Comparison among the Top 10 Competitiveness Enterprises

            Chart6-1 The financial data of return on net assets in comparison of the top 10 competitiveness
                         enterprises in the optical communications field of China in 2019









                    Huawei  HTGD     ZTE    Futong   ZTT    SDGI    Zhongli  Yongding  Fuchunjiang





          Ⅲ Status Analysis of Competitiveness in Comparison of the Top 10 Competitiveness Enterprises

                   Chart6-3 The competitiveness analysis of HTGD        Chart6-7 The competitiveness analysis of SDGI
                         in comparison during 2017-2019                      in comparison during 2017-2019
                                sales revenues˄18% weight˅                          sales revenues˄18% weight˅
                                2.5000                                              2.5000
              The average growth rate of                          The average growth rate of
                net profit for the last   2.0000  net assets˄13% weight˅  net profit for the last   2.0000  net assets˄13% weight˅
              three years˄15% weight˅  1.5000                     three years˄15% weight˅  1.5000
                                1.0000
           The average growth rate of   0.5000                 The average growth rate of   1.0000
           sales revenues for the last             net profit  sales revenues for the last   0.5000    net profit
           three years˄14% weight˅  0.0000         ˄13% weight˅  three years˄14% weight˅  0.0000       ˄13% weight˅
                                -0.5000                                             -0.5000
             The ratio of international                          The ratio of international
              revenues to total sales            return on total assets  revenues to total sales     return on total assets
              revenues˄6% weight˅                  ˄8% weight˅    revenues˄6% weight˅                  ˄8% weight˅
                figures of 2017  sales revenues   return on net assets  figures of 2017  sales revenues
                figures of 2018  contribution per                   figures of 2018  contribution per   return on net assets
                figures of 2019     HTGD      ˄8% weight˅           figures of 2019      SDGI    ˄8% weight˅
                     employee˄5% weight˅                                 employee˄5% weight˅
                                                                                                                    31
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36