Page 11 - Market Analysis Report of Optical Communications Field in China & Global market 2016
P. 11

Ranking of "the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the optical components and auxiliary equipment field of Global market during 2015-2016"

                                           Standard value weighted of the financial data(70% weight)                                            Standard value weighted of the survey data(30% weight)

                                           Return    Return     Sales The ratio of The average        The average       Total                                            Management                             Comprehensive
                                           on total  on net   revenues international growth rate of   growth rate     standard                                              level of  Corporation Total standard index of Comprehensive
Company              Sales Net      Net    assets    assets  contribution revenue sales revenues      of net profit                 Technology  Customer        Brand     enterprise  culture value weighted competitiveness score of
          Ranking revenues assets  profit                                                              for the last     value       innovation  satisfaction  awareness                                                                         Source of financial data  Country
                                           weight                per to total sales for the last      three years    weighted of                                                              of the survey
                    weight weight  weight    8%              employee revenues three years                           the financial                                                                                             competitiveness
                     18% 13%        13%                                                                                                                                                                 data $
%

                                                     weight weight  weight  weight                    weight         data weight                weight weight weight                  weight            %
                                                      8% 5%          6%      14%                       15%           $ 34%
                                                                                                                                                18% 12% 11%                           25%

Finisar   1 2.7266 0.0752 -0.0124 -0.0054 -0.0026 -0.0155 0.0223            -0.0365                   0.1500         2.9017 0.7154 0.4413 0.4539 0.2747                               0.5579            2.4432  2.7642         1000 Annual report of listed company USA

Avago     2 1.2075 0.0694 0.4011 0.0948 0.0442 0.1333 0.0419                0.1400                    0.1500         2.2823 0.7252 0.3681 0.3880 0.2822                               0.6601            2.4236  2.3247         986 Annual report of listed company USA

Viavi     3 1.0349 0.0750 0.2442 -0.0459 -0.0176 0.0288 0.0117              -0.1400                   -0.1500        1.0410 0.7093 0.4162 0.3610 0.2590                               0.6133            2.3588  1.4364         960 Annual report of listed company USA

Accelink  4 0.4865 0.0148 0.0776 0.0386 0.0118 -0.0197 -0.0150              0.1400                    0.1500         0.8846 0.5769 0.3680 0.3846 0.2980                               0.6131            2.2406  1.2914         956 Annual report of listed company China

Sumitomo Electric 5 0.4803 0.0469 0.1593 0.0292 0.0103 -0.0248 0.0167       -0.0033                   0.1500         0.8645 0.5592 0.4914 0.3616 0.2001                               0.6413            2.2536  1.2813         955 Annual report of listed company Japan

Fujikura  6 0.3155 0.0377 0.0527 0.0120 0.0082 -0.0240 0.0146               -0.0523                   0.1500         0.5144 0.7133 0.3740 0.3633 0.2140                               0.5248            2.1894  1.0169         945 Annual report of listed company Japan

Furukawa Electric 7 0.0465 0.0329 0.1224 0.0082 0.0116 -0.0021 -0.0151      -0.1400                   0.1500         0.2145 0.4331 0.4543 0.4459 0.3334                               0.3989            2.0656  0.7698         938 Annual report of listed company Japan

NeoPhotonics 8 0.0647 -0.0024 -0.0413 -0.0002 -0.0005 -0.0148 0.0318        0.0166                    0.1500         0.2040 0.4666 0.2668 0.2526 0.2364                               0.5979            1.8203  0.6889         935 Annual report of listed company USA

Oclaro    9 0.0701 -0.0075 -0.2534 -0.1336 -0.0557 0.0132 0.0379            0.1400                    -0.1500 -0.3390 0.5907 0.3509 0.3505 0.1767                                     0.6206            2.0894  0.3895         926 Annual report of listed company USA

Fujitsu   10 -0.2645 0.0524 0.0884 0.0167 0.0172 0.0104 -0.0001             -0.1400                   -0.1500 -0.3695 0.5858 0.2927 0.2948 0.3423                                     0.5815            2.0971  0.3705         925 Annual report of listed company Japan

Note 1: For the financial data of sales revenues indicator, due to enterprises’ sales revenues derived from diversified products, the data we collect is based on the revenues of relevant products in each sub-sectors of optical communications division. Net profit data is collected from
the relevant products in the optical communications division of the enterprise; Net assets data is collected from the optical communications division of the enterprise.
Note 2: The calculation data of return on net assets and return on total assets are collected from the net profit, net assetsand total assets of the communication division of the selected enterprises. If the enterprise listed does not reveal relevant data in its annual report, they will be
calculated according to the contribution rate of the enterprise’s total profit rate, net assets and total assets.
Note 3: As for the four indicators of sales revenues contribution per employee, the ratio of international revenue to total sales revenues, the average growth rate of sales revenues for the last three years and the average growth rate of net profit for the last three years, we refer to
the released annual reports of the enterprises listed in the rankings, and make no more in subdivision.
Note 4: “Return on net assets” can be defined in different formula. To avoid the incomparable problem of net profit caused by the different corporate income tax rate in listed companies and unlisted companies, we define the molecular in the formula as net profit before tax instead
of net profits. The formula of calculating “return on net assets” is: Return on net assets=net profit before tax/ net assets; Return on total assets=Net profits before tax/ total assets.
Note 5: From the monitoring data, it is found that if the enterprise competitiveness comes mainly from the increase indicators (that is, the average growth rate of revenues for the last three years & the average growth rate of net profit for the last three years), the monitoring data of
the enterprise competitiveness is usually unstable. The main reason for the enterprise competitiveness instability is that the original sales revenues base in these enterprises was small and the increasing sales revenues of recent 2 years make the averag e growth rate of the past
3 years far higher than the industry average level. The extremely high standard value of a certain indicator in the company may cause the standard value of financial data competitiveness index over high on the whole. But in the second or third years, when the growth rate of sales
revenues drops to the normal average level and instead there is no higher growth in the other indicators, the monitoring index of the enterprise competitiveness will decline significantly. To avoid the impact of abnormal change in financial indicators on the objectivity of the enterprise
competitiveness evaluation, we find a practical way to improve it. That is, we set the upper and low limit of standard value in the increase indicators (the average growth rate of revenues for the last three years & the average growth rate of net profit for the last three years) within
[-1,1]. With the consistency of statistical test, the overdone impact on overall standard value of financial data by the abnormal data of growth index can be eliminated.
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16