Page 22 - Market Analysis Report of Optical Communications Field in China & Global market 2016
P. 22
Chapter 3 Competitiveness Analysis of "the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in
the optical fiber and cable field of Global market during 2015-2016"
Ⅰ Analysis of Financial Data
Table3-1 The standard value weighted of financial data of the top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the optical
fiber and cable field of Global market during 2015-2016
The standard value weighted of financial data
Scale sub-factors˄weight 44%˅ Efficiency sub-factors˄weight 27%˅ Increase sub-factors˄weight 29%˅
Total The The
Ranking of Ranking of standard Sales The ratio of Ranking of average average
revenues standard
comprehensive financial data value Sales Net Net Total Ranking of Return Return contribution international Total growth rate growth rate Total Ranking of
assets profit on net value standard standard
Company competitiveness competitiveness weighted of revenues standard standard on total assets per revenue standard weighted of sales of net
weight employee value value
index index the 13% value value assets weight to total sales value of revenues profit weighted weighted
8% weight efficiency of increase of increase
financial data weighted weighted revenues weighted for the last for the last
index index index
of scale of scale of efficiency three years three years
weight weight index index weight weight index weight weight
14% 15%
18% 13% 8% 5% 6%
Corning 1 1 1.7210 0.8794 0.7020 0.3082 1.8896 1 0.0442 -0.0005 0.0288 0.0489 0.1214 6 -0.1400 -0.1500 -0.2900 12
YOFC 2 2 1.2931 0.5871 0.2431 0.1606 0.9908 2 0.1066 0.0511 0.0695 0.0012 0.2284 2 -0.0762 0.1500 0.0738 5
HTGD 3 3 1.2192 0.3261 0.3189 0.1612 0.8063 5 0.0452 0.0550 0.0222 0.0005 0.1229 5 0.1400 0.1500 0.2900 1
Prysmian 4 4 1.2190 0.5959 0.2704 0.0551 0.9213 4 0.1102 0.0402 0.0870 0.0503 0.2877 1 -0.1400 0.1500 0.0100 7
5
Furukawa 6 5 1.0285 0.6331 0.2661 0.0853 0.9846 3 0.0006 0.0158 0.0069 0.0106 0.0340 10 -0.1400 0.1500 0.0100 7
Electric/OFS 7
6 0.8473 0.0114 0.4999 0.1873 0.6986 6 0.0202 0.0181 0.0025 0.0098 0.0506 9 0.0916 0.0065 0.0981 4
FiberHome
Communications 7 0.8462 0.2474 0.2496 0.1081 0.6050 7 0.0648 0.0158 0.0474 -0.0031 0.1249 4 0.1400 -0.0238 0.1162 3
Futong
Sumitomo Electric 8 9 0.7061 0.1121 0.3760 0.1062 0.5943 8 0.0530 0.0110 -0.0324 0.0447 0.0763 8 -0.1145 0.1500 0.0355 6
ZTT 9 8 0.8459 0.0208 0.2454 0.1166 0.3828 10 0.0934 0.0214 0.0512 0.0070 0.1731 3 0.1400 0.1500 0.2900 1
Fujikura 10 10 0.2602 -0.1183 0.2973 0.0457 0.2247 11 0.0100 0.0036 -0.0310 0.0429 0.0255 11 -0.1400 0.1500 0.0100 7
Ⅱ Financial Data of Return on Net Assets in Comparison among the Top 10 Competitiveness Enterprises
Chart3-1 The financial data of return on net assets in comparison of the top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the optical
fiber and cable field of Global market during 2015-2016
Corning Prysmian FEurleucktariwc/aOFS FCiboemrmHoumniecations Futong SumEitloemctroic Fujikura
YOFC HTGD ZTT
Ⅲ Status Analysis of Competitiveness in Comparison of the Top 10 Competitiveness Enterprises
Chart3-2 The competitiveness analysis of Corning in comparison during 2014-2016 Chart3-3 The competitiveness analysis of YOFC in comparison during 2014-2016
sales revenues˄18% weight˅ sales revenues˄18% weight˅
2.0000 2.0000
The average growth rate of net profit for the 1.5000 net assets˄13% weight˅ The average growth rate of net profit for the 1.5000 net assets˄13% weight˅
last three years˄15% weight˅ 1.0000 last three years˄15% weight˅ 1.0000
0.5000 The average growth rate of sales 0.5000
revenues for the last three years
The average growth rate of sales 0.0000 net profit˄13% weight˅ 0.0000 net profit˄13% weight˅
-0.5000 ˄14% weight˅ -0.5000
revenues for the last three years -1.0000
˄14% weight˅ -1.0000
The ratio of international revenues to return on total assets The ratio of international revenues to return on total assets
total sales revenues˄6% weight˅ ˄8% weight˅ total sales revenues˄6% weight˅ ˄8% weight˅
figures of 2014 Corning return on net assets figures of 2014 YOFC return on net assets
figures of 2015 ˄8% weight˅ figures of 2015 ˄8% weight˅
figures of 2016 sales revenues contribution figures of 2016 sales revenues contribution
per employee˄5% weight˅ per employee˄5% weight˅
22
